Skip to main content
This forum is closed to new posts and responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:

HCL Software Customer Support Portal for U.S. Federal Government clients
HCL Software Customer Support Portal

HCL Notes/Domino 8.5 Forum (includes Notes Traveler)

HCL Notes/Domino 8.5 Forum (includes Notes Traveler)

Previous Next

Toy or Trojan?

Egor,
I understand sarcasm and think its effective, but in this case there's other considerations you may want to import into your view of the future of Domino. One thing to consider is that xpages was committed at Lotusphere to be coming to the Notes Client as well. Additionally, BlackBerry will be supporting xpages too, beginning with the higher current models, but on all new ones as they come out. So we do have an evolution of Notes development with the promise of "develop once, use anywhere". Regarding the enterprise integration, I wouldn't be so convinced that transactional ability will not be part of the plan. Once you have xpages talking to data sources beyond the NSF themselves, there are all sorts of possibilities. Add as well the fact that xpages enables application development possibilities way beyond standard Notes form/view development models. For starters, the ability to have more than one data source per pages, even joins, images in views, etc, etc. I fully understand the disappointment in the halt in NSFDB2 development. Hey, I'm an iSeries customer and I was totally miffed when they announced they would not advance to this platform, but I have to think they already saw there was a better, more expansive way of doing integration and adding relation database access to xpages, used in your choice of client, is a very positive thing. I encourage you to look further at xpages. Sorry, its not going to do exactly what you want today, but the direction is very promising.
NSFDB2 was a dead end and it never would have become what we wanted it to due to the restriction in the architecture.


Feedback response number WEBB7NVKC7 created by ~Gus Chukikonyoni on 02/02/2009

DB2NSF replacement (~Judy Destookon... 29.Jan.09)
. . Does this mean that DB2 integration... (~Elizabeth Cish... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . . . xpages can incorporate DB2 access (Roland Reddekop... 2.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . Toy or Trojan? (Roland Reddekop... 2.Feb.09)
. . NSFDB2 plans (~Tate Nonkizenl... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . I would suggest that you didn't tal... (~Dana Chulumarf... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . I need View Contention to go away (~Chris Bubfreep... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . . . Writing out to RDBMS (~Dana Chulumarf... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . how would you handle huge #docs and... (~Tanita Asaboos... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . Domino is a repository (~Olga Asaponeso... 2.Feb.09)
. . . . . . Domino/Notes is really business wor... (~Isaac Quetnute... 20.Feb.09)
. . . . . . use the rigth design (Ioan Crisan 20.Feb.09)
. . . . the second Garnet move (~Judy Destookon... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . . . NSFDB2 support available until 2017... (~Tate Nonkizenl... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . . . . . Query views...but requesting which ... (~Nicole Minaber... 30.Jan.09)
. . . . . . . . . . use the agent trigger "when docs ar... (Ioan Crisan 20.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . actually this one is (Ioan Crisan 24.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . transactions (Pejman Parandi 2.Feb.09)
. . There's more discussion on NSF's po... (~Sanjay Quettum... 29.Jan.09)
. . . . the backend is poor (~Judy Destookon... 2.Feb.09)
. . . . . . Rating something as "Poor" is relat... (~Gus Chukikonyo... 2.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . The idea has long history... (Vladimir Panov 3.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . That's very interesting... (~Sanjay Quettum... 3.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . NSF versus a relational DB (~Sanjay Quettum... 2.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . YES WE CAN :)) (~Judy Destookon... 3.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . simple applications need relational... (~Judy Destookon... 3.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . LMAO (~Naomi Deskrote... 4.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . obscured by clouds (~Judy Destookon... 5.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Happy with what I already have" (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LMAO at "chasing with a pitchfork" (~Sanjay Quettum... 8.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . dynamic queries, triggers ... (~Judy Destookon... 10.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Normalization (~Naomi Deskrote... 10.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pet store application (~Judy Destookon... 10.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Defining your own limitations (~Naomi Deskrote... 12.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eCommerce web sites (~Judy Destookon... 13.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I don't think you're clear on the m... (~Naomi Deskrote... 13.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fact = market <eom> (~Judy Destookon... 13.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . by the way (~Judy Destookon... 10.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . Trivial (~Naomi Deskrote... 4.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . db2nsf (~Judy Destookon... 5.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agreed (~Sanjay Quettum... 5.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . Resolving keys in a view (~Olga Asaponeso... 5.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yesterday's complaint (~Naomi Deskrote... 7.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NSFDB2 helped Lotusscript programme... (Nathan T. Freem... 10.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pureXML (Pejman Parandi 10.Feb.09)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The query views work in all version... (Bruce Lill 24.Feb.09)




Printer-friendly

Search this forum

Member Tools


RSS Feeds

 RSS feedsRSS
All forum posts RSS
All main topics RSS